Revolution - Luke 5:31-32
Back in the day, who you ate with was a big deal. To share a meal with someone was to imply approval of them, their life style, etc. So imagine the shock when a teacher, a holy man, begins eating with the dregs of society. Obviously prostitution and thievery aren't things to aspire too, so why would Jesus eat with people for whom those things were a matter of daily life? I think there are two things at work here, the first and most obvious is something that is repeated in three of the four gospels. Luke 5: 31-32 "It is not those who are well who need a doctor, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous to repentance, but sinners." The society of the day wasn't looking for a cure, they thought they were doing just fine, They were looking for the political and physical power to "get what they deserved". They were due for many disappointments. But those who were hurting, and wanting, and seeking, it was to them Jesus came, and to them he brought the cure. It wasn't that he was approving of their sins; they simply needed help, and were willing to accept it.
The second aspect is that I think it shows the glory and power of God to a greater extent. If Jesus were to limit Himself to those who didn't need Him, what would that prove? Why would anyone remember him? A man who brings sand to someone stranded in the Sahara will find no kindly reception, but to him to brings water.... It is God's glory to use the broken things of the world to shame the sound. If we will admit it, we are all broken, all needing repair; but if we surrender ourselves to Him, even we broken tools can bring life and hope and love to the lost and dying.






